ATI Radeon X1650 PRO vs Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1467
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.35
Architectureno dataUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameno dataRV530
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 March 2026 (less than a year ago)1 February 2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data157 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.400
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5x-8533GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed8533 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2026 1 February 2007
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 44 Watt

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 19 years.

ATI X1650 PRO, on the other hand, has 70% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between M5 Max 40-Core GPU and Radeon X1650 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1650 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 633 votes

Rate M5 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 70 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M5 Max 40-Core GPU or Radeon X1650 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.