Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU vs Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 3 March 2026 (less than a year ago) | 10 November 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | 14 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1296 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR5x-8533 | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Memory clock speed | 8533 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 March 2026 | 10 November 2020 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 5 years.
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between M5 Max 40-Core GPU and M1 Pro 14-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
