Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 31 July 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 20 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 3 nm | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | no data |
| L2 Cache | no data | 576 KB |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR5x-8533 | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 8533 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 31 July 2025 |
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has an age advantage of 9 months.
We couldn't decide between M4 Pro 20-Core GPU and Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU is a desktop graphics card while Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
