Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU vs Apple M1 GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated643
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataXe3 (2026)
GPU code nameno dataWildcat Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 November 2020 (5 years ago)1 May 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores816
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology5 nmno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2020 1 May 2026

Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU has an age advantage of 5 years.

We couldn't decide between M1 GPU and Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 475 votes

Rate M1 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 GPU or Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.