Apollo Lake GT1 5 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 436 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) |
| GPU code name | no data | Apollo Lake GT1 5 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (5 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 144 |
| Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| ROPs | no data | 3 |
| TMUs | no data | 18 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between M1 8-Core GPU and Apollo Lake GT1 5. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook graphics card while Apollo Lake GT1 5 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
