Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs ATI All-In-Wonder X800 VE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated728
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.34
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameR420DG1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 April 2005 (21 years ago)31 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed425 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate3.40079.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs848
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 April 2005 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder X800 VE and Iris Xe MAX Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder X800 VE is a desktop graphics card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 VE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 292 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder X800 VE or Iris Xe MAX Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.