Quadro NVS 285 vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1528
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.47
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRV635NV44 A2
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2008 (18 years ago)6 June 2006 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $27.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120no data
Core clock speed722 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors378 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate5.7761.100
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length232 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI1x DMS-59
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 6 June 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 18 Watt

ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 285, on the other hand, has 206% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD 3650 and Quadro NVS 285. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder HD 3650 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 285 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD 3650 or Quadro NVS 285, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.