A100 SXM4 vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRage 4GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 June 1999 (27 years ago)14 May 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6912
Core clock speed90 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors8 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data400 Watt
Texture fill rate0.36609.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs4160
TMUs4432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cacheno data20.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRHBM2E
Maximum RAM amount16 MB40 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed90 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth720.0 MB/s1,555 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 40 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 7 nm

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 20 years, a 255900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 PCI and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 128 PCI is a desktop graphics card while A100 SXM4 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 179 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 128 PCI or A100 SXM4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.