NVS 300 vs A100 SXM4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiencyno data1.20
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGA100GT218
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 May 2020 (6 years ago)8 January 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores691216
Core clock speed1410 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate609.14.160
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs1604
TMUs4328
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MBno data
L2 Cache40 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EDDR3
Maximum RAM amount40 GB512 MB
Memory bus width5120 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s12.64 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA8.01.2
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 8 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 18 Watt

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 300, on the other hand, has 2122% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and NVS 300. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 179 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 52 votes

Rate NVS 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A100 SXM4 or NVS 300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.