UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1095
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.67
Architectureno dataGen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameRage Pro TurboGen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 1997 (29 years ago)11 January 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data24
Core clock speed75 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors8 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology350 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08no data
ROPs1no data
TMUs1no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRno data
Maximum RAM amount4 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed75 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth600 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012_1
OpenGL1.1no data
OpenCLNoneno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 1997 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 350 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has an age advantage of 23 years, and a 3400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage PRO Turbo and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage PRO Turbo is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 136 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage PRO Turbo or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.