ATI FireGL 8800 vs ATI 3D Rage PRO AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 3 (1997−1998)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameRage PROR200
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 March 1997 (29 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed75 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors8 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate0.082.400
ROPs14
TMUs18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 1xAGP 4x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount2 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed75 MHz290 MHz
Memory bandwidth600.0 MB/s9.28 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.08.1
OpenGL1.11.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 1997 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 350 nm 150 nm

ATI FireGL 8800 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage PRO AGP and FireGL 8800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage PRO AGP is a desktop graphics card while FireGL 8800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate 3D Rage PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate FireGL 8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage PRO AGP or FireGL 8800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.