Core 2 Solo U2200 vs Z-01

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Z-01
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.19
Core 2 Solo U2200
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.20
+5.3%

Core 2 Solo U2200 outperforms Z-01 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Z-01 and Core 2 Solo U2200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32443241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataCore 2 Solo
Power efficiency3.003.44
Architecture codenameDesna (2011)Merom-L (2007)
Release date1 June 2011 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Z-01 and Core 2 Solo U2200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography40 nm65 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.8V-1V

Compatibility

Information on Z-01 and Core 2 Solo U2200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1no data
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Z-01 and Core 2 Solo U2200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A, AMD-Vno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Z-01 and Core 2 Solo U2200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Z-01 and Core 2 Solo U2200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Z-01 and Core 2 Solo U2200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6250no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Z-01 0.19
Core 2 Solo U2200 0.20
+5.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Z-01 305
Core 2 Solo U2200 311
+2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 0.20
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 5 Watt

Z-01 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Solo U2200, on the other hand, has a 5.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Z-01 and Core 2 Solo U2200.


Should you still have questions on choice between Z-01 and Core 2 Solo U2200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Z-01
Z-01
Intel Core 2 Solo U2200
Core 2 Solo U2200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 11 votes

Rate Z-01 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Solo U2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Z-01 or Core 2 Solo U2200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.