EPYC 7C13 vs Xeon w9-3575X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
46.69
+8%

Xeon w9-3575X outperforms EPYC 7C13 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5968
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.61no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency5.848.17
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date24 August 2024 (1 year ago)2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,789no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon w9-3575X and EPYC 7C13 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4464 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Performance-cores44no data
Threads88128
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.68 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache97.5 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm7 nm
Die size4x 477 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w9-3575X and EPYC 7C13 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA4677SP3
Power consumption (TDP)340 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w9-3575X and EPYC 7C13. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w9-3575X and EPYC 7C13 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w9-3575X and EPYC 7C13 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w9-3575X and EPYC 7C13. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR4
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w9-3575X and EPYC 7C13.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes112128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon w9-3575X 46.69
+8%
EPYC 7C13 43.22

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon w9-3575X 82507
+8%
Samples: 8
EPYC 7C13 76363
Samples: 54

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.69 43.22
Physical cores 44 64
Threads 88 128
Power consumption (TDP) 340 Watt 225 Watt

Xeon w9-3575X has a 8% higher aggregate performance score.

EPYC 7C13, on the other hand, has 45.5% more physical cores and 45.5% more threads, and 51.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon w9-3575X and AMD EPYC 7C13.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X
AMD EPYC 7C13
EPYC 7C13

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7C13 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon w9-3575X and EPYC 7C13, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.