Xeon Gold 5420+ vs w9-3495X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
59.07
+58.6%
Xeon Gold 5420+
2023
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
37.24

w9-3495X outperforms Gold 5420+ by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Gold 5420+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1780
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameSapphire RapidsSapphire Rapids
Release date1 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Gold 5420+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads11256
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache105 MB52.5 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm10 nm
Die size4x 477 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °C84 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Gold 5420+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA46774677
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Gold 5420+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Gold 5420+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Gold 5420+ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Gold 5420+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Gold 5420+.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes11280

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w9-3495X 59.07
+58.6%
Xeon Gold 5420+ 37.24

w9-3495X outperforms Gold 5420+ by 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon w9-3495X 91358
+58.6%
Xeon Gold 5420+ 57593

w9-3495X outperforms Gold 5420+ by 59% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.07 37.24
Physical cores 56 28
Threads 112 56
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5420+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon Gold 5420+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X
Intel Xeon Gold 5420+
Xeon Gold 5420+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 176 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 5420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w9-3495X or Xeon Gold 5420+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.