Xeon E-2478 vs w9-3495X

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
57.88
+208%
Xeon E-2478
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
18.78

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Xeon E-2478 by a whopping 208% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon E-2478 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.8282.64
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency15.6522.22
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date15 February 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,889$568

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2478 has 339% better value for money than Xeon w9-3495X.

Detailed specifications

Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon E-2478 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads11216
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache105 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size4x 477 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon E-2478 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4677FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon E-2478. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon E-2478 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon E-2478 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon E-2478. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TB128 GB
Max memory channels82
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon E-2478.

PCIe version5.05
PCI Express lanes11216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w9-3495X 57.88
+208%
Xeon E-2478 18.78

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon w9-3495X 91936
+208%
Xeon E-2478 29827

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.88 18.78
Recency 15 February 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 56 8
Threads 112 16
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon w9-3495X has a 208.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

Xeon E-2478, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 337.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2478 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w9-3495X and Xeon E-2478, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X
Intel Xeon E-2478
Xeon E-2478

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 176 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2478 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w9-3495X or Xeon E-2478, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.