Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Xeon w9-3495X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
57.83
+222%
Ryzen AI 9 365
2024
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
17.97

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Ryzen AI 9 365 by a whopping 222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w9-3495X and Ryzen AI 9 365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20344
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.76no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency15.6460.74
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Strix Point (2024)
Release date15 February 2023 (1 year ago)July 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,889no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon w9-3495X and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads11220
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache105 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size4x 477 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w9-3495X and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4677FP8
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w9-3495X and Ryzen AI 9 365 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Ryzen AI 9 365.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes11216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w9-3495X 57.83
+222%
Ryzen AI 9 365 17.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon w9-3495X 91866
+222%
Ryzen AI 9 365 28545

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.83 17.97
Physical cores 56 10
Threads 112 20
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon w9-3495X has a 221.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 460% more physical cores and 460% more threads.

Ryzen AI 9 365, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 9 365 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon w9-3495X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 365 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w9-3495X and Ryzen AI 9 365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 177 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 42 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w9-3495X or Ryzen AI 9 365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.