EPYC 8024P vs Xeon w9-3495X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
59.07
+344%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms EPYC 8024P by a whopping 344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 8024P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17532
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameSapphire RapidsSiena
Release date1 January 2023 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 8024P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads11216
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache105 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm5 nm
Die size4x 477 mm273 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °C75 °C
Number of transistorsno data8,875 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 8024P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4677SP6
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 8024P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 8024P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 8024P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 8024P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 8024P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes112no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w9-3495X 59.07
+344%
EPYC 8024P 13.29

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms EPYC 8024P by 344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon w9-3495X 91358
+344%
EPYC 8024P 20556

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms EPYC 8024P by 344% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.07 13.29
Physical cores 56 8
Threads 112 16
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 90 Watt

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 8024P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w9-3495X and EPYC 8024P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X
AMD EPYC 8024P
EPYC 8024P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 176 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8024P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w9-3495X or EPYC 8024P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.