Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Xeon w9-3495X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
57.88
+107%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024
12 cores / 12 threads, 32 Watt
27.99

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w9-3495X and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.77no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataApple M4
Power efficiency15.6582.78
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)no data
Release date15 February 2023 (1 year ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,889no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon w9-3495X and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads11212
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.592 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.51 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache105 MBno data
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Die size4x 477 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w9-3495X and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA4677no data
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w9-3495X and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M4 16-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w9-3495X and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores).

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes112no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.88 27.99
Recency 15 February 2023 30 October 2024
Physical cores 56 12
Threads 112 12
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 32 Watt

Xeon w9-3495X has a 106.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 366.7% more physical cores and 833.3% more threads.

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 993.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon w9-3495X is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w9-3495X and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 176 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w9-3495X or Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.