EPYC 9275F vs Xeon w5-3425

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking221not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.53no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency8.14no data
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Turin (2024)
Release date15 February 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,189$3,439

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2448
Base clock speed3.2 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size4x 477 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA4677SP5
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 9275F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 9275F.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes112128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 February 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 24 48
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon w5-3425 has 18.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w5-3425
Xeon w5-3425
AMD EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate Xeon w5-3425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9275F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w5-3425 or EPYC 9275F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.