Ryzen AI 5 330 vs Xeon X7560
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 5 330 outperforms Xeon X7560 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1483 | 1187 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 1.50 | 11.11 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | no data | Krackan Point 2 (2025) |
| Release date | 1 January 2010 (16 years ago) | 16 July 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X7560 and Ryzen AI 5 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.27 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.67 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X7560 and Ryzen AI 5 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1567,FCLGA1567 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X7560 and Ryzen AI 5 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon X7560 and Ryzen AI 5 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X7560 and Ryzen AI 5 330 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X7560 and Ryzen AI 5 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 820M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X7560 and Ryzen AI 5 330.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 14 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.63 | 7.37 |
| Recency | 1 January 2010 | 16 July 2025 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 28 Watt |
Xeon X7560 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen AI 5 330, on the other hand, has a 59% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 364% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon X7560 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon X7560 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 5 330 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
