EPYC 7713 vs Xeon X7460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X7460
2008
6 cores / 6 threads, 130 Watt
2.99
EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
51.52
+1623%

EPYC 7713 outperforms Xeon X7460 by a whopping 1623% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking177638
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.134.18
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency2.2222.07
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameDunnington (2008)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date15 September 2008 (16 years ago)15 March 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,729$7,060

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7713 has 3115% better value for money than Xeon X7460.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon X7460 and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads6128
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.67 GHz3.68 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per module)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size503 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,900 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.45Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X7460 and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration42
SocketPGA604SP3
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X7460 and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon X7460 and EPYC 7713 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X7460 and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X7460 and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X7460 and EPYC 7713.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon X7460 2.99
EPYC 7713 51.52
+1623%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon X7460 4803
EPYC 7713 82825
+1624%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.99 51.52
Recency 15 September 2008 15 March 2021
Physical cores 6 64
Threads 6 128
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 225 Watt

Xeon X7460 has 73.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7713, on the other hand, has a 1623.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 966.7% more physical cores and 2033.3% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon X7460 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X7460
Xeon X7460
AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Xeon X7460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 117 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon X7460 and EPYC 7713, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.