EPYC 9654 vs Xeon X7350

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X7350 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1122	4
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.22	10.11
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	no data	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	no data	Genoa
Release date	1 July 2007 (16 years ago)	10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$11,805
Current price	$75	$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9654 has 355% better value for money than Xeon X7350.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X7350 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	no data	96
Threads	no data	192
Base clock speed	2.93 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	no data	3.7 GHz
L1 cache	no data	64K (per core)
L2 cache	no data	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	8 MB L2 Cache	384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	65 nm	5 nm, 6 nm
Die size	no data	12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature	66 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	78,840 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	No	No
VID voltage range	1V-1.5V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X7350 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	2
Socket	PGA604,PPGA604	SP5
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X7350 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	no data	+
AVX	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
FSB parity	+	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Xeon X7350 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X7350 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X7350 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size	no data	6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X7350 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version	no data	5.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon X7350 by 1457% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	5.07	78.93
Recency	1 July 2007	10 November 2022
Chip lithography	65 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	360 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X7350 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---