i5-10200H vs Xeon X7350
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-10200H outperforms Xeon X7350 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1512 | 1499 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.13 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 1.45 | 4.29 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Tigerton (2007) | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
| Release date | 6 September 2007 (18 years ago) | 17 September 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,301 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Xeon X7350 and Core i5-10200H: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.93 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per die) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 64 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 582 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1V-1.5V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X7350 and Core i5-10200H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | PGA604,PPGA604 | FCBGA1440 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X7350 and Core i5-10200H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X7350 and Core i5-10200H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X7350 and Core i5-10200H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X7350 and Core i5-10200H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 45.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.05 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X7350 and Core i5-10200H integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon X7350 and Core i5-10200H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304@30Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon X7350 and Core i5-10200H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X7350 and Core i5-10200H.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.48 | 4.57 |
| Recency | 6 September 2007 | 17 September 2020 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon X7350 has 50% more physical cores.
i5-10200H, on the other hand, has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 33% more threads, a 364% more advanced lithography process, and 189% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon X7350 and Intel Core i5-10200H.
Be aware that Xeon X7350 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-10200H is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
