Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs X5698

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5698
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.17
Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 145 Watt
16.45
+658%

Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Xeon X5698 by a whopping 658% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5698 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1857404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.32
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency1.5810.73
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)25 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,938

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5698 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads444
Base clock speed4.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rateno data2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)55 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm2456.12 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million7,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5698 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
Socket1366FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5698 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon X5698 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5698 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5698 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5698 and Xeon E5-2699A v4.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5698 2.17
Xeon E5-2699A v4 16.45
+658%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5698 3447
Xeon E5-2699A v4 26129
+658%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.17 16.45
Recency 14 February 2011 25 October 2016
Physical cores 2 22
Threads 4 44
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 145 Watt

Xeon X5698 has 11.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2699A v4, on the other hand, has a 658.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 1000% more physical cores and 1000% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5698 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5698 and Xeon E5-2699A v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5698
Xeon X5698
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Xeon X5698 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 53 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5698 or Xeon E5-2699A v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.