Xeon W-3275 vs X5690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5690
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.54
Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
26.87
+492%

W-3275 outperforms X5690 by a whopping 492% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5690 and Xeon W-3275 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1245161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.547.06
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$205$4,449
Current price$115 (0.6x MSRP)$5391 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3275 has 56% better value for money than Xeon X5690.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5690 and Xeon W-3275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads1256
Base clock speed3.46 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1.75 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)28 MB
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)38.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature79 °C76 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5690 and Xeon W-3275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5690 and Xeon W-3275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon X5690 and Xeon W-3275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5690 and Xeon W-3275 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5690 and Xeon W-3275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size288 GB1 TB
Max memory channels36
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5690 and Xeon W-3275.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5690 4.54
Xeon W-3275 26.87
+492%

W-3275 outperforms X5690 by 492% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X5690 7026
Xeon W-3275 41554
+491%

W-3275 outperforms X5690 by 491% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.54 26.87
Recency 14 February 2011 3 June 2019
Physical cores 6 28
Threads 12 56
Cost $205 $4449
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon W-3275 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5690 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5690 and Xeon W-3275, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5690
Xeon X5690
Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 421 vote

Rate Xeon X5690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5690 or Xeon W-3275, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.