Xeon L5638 vs X5687

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5687
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.35
+43.2%
Xeon L5638
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
2.34

Xeon X5687 outperforms Xeon L5638 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5687 and Xeon L5638 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15671788
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.401.73
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.433.68
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$121$90

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5687 has 97% better value for money than Xeon L5638.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5687 and Xeon L5638 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.86 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C85 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5687 and Xeon L5638 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon L5638. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5687 and Xeon L5638 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon L5638 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon L5638. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon L5638.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5687 3.35
+43.2%
Xeon L5638 2.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5687 5309
+43.2%
Xeon L5638 3707

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.35 2.34
Recency 14 February 2011 16 March 2010
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 60 Watt

Xeon X5687 has a 43.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.

Xeon L5638, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 116.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5687 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5638 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5687 and Xeon L5638, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5687
Xeon X5687
Intel Xeon L5638
Xeon L5638

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 53 votes

Rate Xeon X5687 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon L5638 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5687 or Xeon L5638, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.