Mobile Sempron 3400+ vs Xeon X5687

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5687 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1564not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.48no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataMobile Sempron
Power efficiency2.43no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Albany
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$121no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5687 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.86 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5687 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366no data
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5687 and Mobile Sempron 3400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5687 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5687 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5687 and Mobile Sempron 3400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5687 and Mobile Sempron 3400+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5687 5309
+1874%
Mobile Sempron 3400+ 269

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 62 Watt

Xeon X5687 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Mobile Sempron 3400+, on the other hand, has 109.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X5687 and Mobile Sempron 3400+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X5687 is a server/workstation processor while Mobile Sempron 3400+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5687 and Mobile Sempron 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5687
Xeon X5687
AMD Mobile Sempron 3400+
Mobile Sempron 3400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 53 votes

Rate Xeon X5687 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5687 or Mobile Sempron 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.