EPYC 9335 vs Xeon X5680

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5680 and EPYC 9335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1366not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.41no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.12no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Turin (2024)
Release date14 February 2010 (14 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$172$3,178

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5680 and EPYC 9335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed3.33 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size239 mm24x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million33,260 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5680 and EPYC 9335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366SP5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5680 and EPYC 9335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon X5680 and EPYC 9335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5680 and EPYC 9335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5680 and EPYC 9335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5680 and EPYC 9335.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 February 2010 10 October 2024
Physical cores 6 32
Threads 12 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 210 Watt

Xeon X5680 has 61.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9335, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X5680 and EPYC 9335. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5680 and EPYC 9335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5680
Xeon X5680
AMD EPYC 9335
EPYC 9335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 337 votes

Rate Xeon X5680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5680 or EPYC 9335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.