Atom N435 vs Xeon X5680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5680
2010, $172
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
3.96
+4300%

Xeon X5680 outperforms Atom N435 by a whopping 4300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16373713
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.38no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAtom
Power efficiency1.290.76
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date14 February 2010 (16 years ago)2 June 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$172no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon X5680 and Atom N435: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5680 and Atom N435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5680 and Atom N435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5680 and Atom N435 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5680 and Atom N435 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5680 and Atom N435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5680 and Atom N435.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon X5680 3.96
+4300%
Atom N435 0.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon X5680 6914
+4419%
Samples: 335
Atom N435 153
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.96 0.09
Recency 14 February 2010 2 June 2011
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 5 Watt

Xeon X5680 has a 4300% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 41% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N435, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2500% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon X5680 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N435 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5680 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N435 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 366 votes

Rate Xeon X5680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 39 votes

Rate Atom N435 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon X5680 and Atom N435, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.