Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Xeon X5680
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5680 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1354 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.13 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | 2x AMD Athlon 64 |
Power efficiency | 3.14 | no data |
Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Tyler (2007−2009) |
Release date | 14 February 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 November 2009 (15 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $172 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5680 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 12 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.33 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 1600 MHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 0 MB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 239 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 79 °C | 95 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,170 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5680 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | Socket S1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 20 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5680 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | 86x Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP), MMX, PowerNow, SSE3,-64, Enhanced 3DNow |
AES-NI | + | - |
PowerNow | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5680 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5680 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5680 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 288 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5680 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 14 February 2010 | 1 November 2009 |
Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
Threads | 12 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 20 Watt |
Xeon X5680 has an age advantage of 3 months, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X5680 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X5680 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5680 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.