Xeon Gold 6330N vs X5675

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5675
2011, $162
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.68
Xeon Gold 6330N
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 165 Watt
20.77
+464%

Xeon Gold 6330N outperforms Xeon X5675 by a whopping 464% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1699342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.26no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.635.31
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)no data
Release date14 February 2011 (15 years ago)1 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon X5675 and Xeon Gold 6330N: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads1256
Base clock speed3.06 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)42 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature81 °C86 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Xeon Gold 6330N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon Gold 6330N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Xeon Gold 6330N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon Gold 6330N are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon Gold 6330N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2667
Maximum memory size288 GB6 TB
Max memory channels38
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon Gold 6330N.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon X5675 3.68
Xeon Gold 6330N 20.77
+464%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon X5675 6438
Samples: 421
Xeon Gold 6330N 36360
+465%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.68 20.77
Recency 14 February 2011 1 April 2021
Physical cores 6 28
Threads 12 56
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon X5675 has 74% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6330N, on the other hand, has a 464% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 367% more physical cores and 367% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6330N is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon X5675 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 688 votes

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6330N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon X5675 and Xeon Gold 6330N, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.