Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Xeon X5675

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5675 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1425not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.03no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency4.00no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Strix Halo (2025)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)6 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5675 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed3.06 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FP11
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon 8060S

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 February 2011 6 January 2025
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 55 Watt

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an age advantage of 13 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 72.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X5675 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5675
Xeon X5675
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 638 votes

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI Max 395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5675 or Ryzen AI Max+ 395, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.