Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon X5675

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5675
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.16
Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.53
+105%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon X5675 by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 5 2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1322836
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.1919.09
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Pinnacle Riege (Zen+)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162$199
Current price$78 (0.5x MSRP)$142 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 2600 has 772% better value for money than Xeon X5675.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 5 2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed3.06 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size239 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C95 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 5 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 5 2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2DDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 5 2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 5 2600 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 5 2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size288 GB128 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 5 2600.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5675 4.16
Ryzen 5 2600 8.53
+105%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon X5675 by 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X5675 6433
Ryzen 5 2600 13197
+105%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon X5675 by 105% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon X5675 500
Ryzen 5 2600 1154
+131%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon X5675 by 131% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon X5675 2460
Ryzen 5 2600 4857
+97.4%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon X5675 by 97% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.16 8.53
Recency 14 February 2011 19 April 2018
Cost $162 $199
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 5 2600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5675 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Ryzen 5 2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5675
Xeon X5675
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 595 votes

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 14296 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5675 or Ryzen 5 2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.