Solo T1200 vs Xeon X5675
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X5675 outperforms Core Solo T1200 by a whopping 2419% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1419 | 3301 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.08 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Core Solo |
| Power efficiency | 3.99 | 0.56 |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 14 February 2011 (13 years ago) | January 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $162 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.06 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.46 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 12288 KB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | 90 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 81 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 151 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | 479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
| Maximum memory size | 288 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.03 | 0.16 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 27 Watt |
Xeon X5675 has a 2418.8% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Solo T1200, on the other hand, has 251.9% lower power consumption.
The Xeon X5675 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation processor while Core Solo T1200 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Core Solo T1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
