Celeron J4025 vs Xeon X5675

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5675
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.03
+333%
Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93

Xeon X5675 outperforms Celeron J4025 by a whopping 333% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5675 and Celeron J4025 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14212526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.082.67
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.018.80
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5675 has 53% better value for money than Celeron J4025.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5675 and Celeron J4025 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.06 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm293 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Celeron J4025 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366Intel BGA 1090
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Celeron J4025. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Celeron J4025 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Celeron J4025 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Celeron J4025. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Celeron J4025.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5675 4.03
+333%
Celeron J4025 0.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5675 6396
+333%
Celeron J4025 1477

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5675 502
+52.6%
Celeron J4025 329

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5675 2464
+357%
Celeron J4025 539

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 0.93
Recency 14 February 2011 4 November 2019
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon X5675 has a 333.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Celeron J4025, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5675 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J4025 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Celeron J4025, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5675
Xeon X5675
Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 635 votes

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 129 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5675 or Celeron J4025, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.