Athlon X4 860K vs Xeon X5675

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5675 and Athlon X4 860K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1300	1731
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.19	0.49
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date	14 February 2011 (13 years ago)	12 August 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$162	no data
Current price	$78 (0.5x MSRP)	$112

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5675 has 347% better value for money than Athlon X4 860K.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5675 and Athlon X4 860K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	12	4
Base clock speed	3.06 GHz	3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.46 GHz	4 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	256K
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	4 MB
L3 cache	12288 KB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Die size	239 mm2	245 mm2
Maximum core temperature	81 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	72 °C
Number of transistors	1,170 million	2,411 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Athlon X4 860K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1
Socket	FCLGA1366,LGA1366	FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Athlon X4 860K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	no data	+
AVX	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	1.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	40 Bit	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Athlon X4 860K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Athlon X4 860K are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Athlon X4 860K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size	288 GB	no data
Max memory channels	3	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Athlon X4 860K.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5675 outperforms Athlon X4 860K by 88% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	4.16	2.21
Recency	14 February 2011	12 August 2014
Physical cores	6	4
Threads	12	4
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Athlon X4 860K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---