Solo T1350 vs Xeon X5670
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X5670 outperforms Core Solo T1350 by a whopping 3109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1742 | 3678 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.06 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Xeon (Desktop) | Core Solo |
| Power efficiency | 1.57 | 0.17 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 16 March 2010 (16 years ago) | January 2006 (20 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Xeon X5670 and Core Solo T1350: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Bus rate | 6400 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | 90 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 81 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 151 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.95V-1.262V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5670 and Core Solo T1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5670 and Core Solo T1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | - |
| PAE | 40 Bit | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Xeon X5670 and Core Solo T1350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5670 and Core Solo T1350 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | - |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5670 and Core Solo T1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
| Maximum memory size | 288 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5670 and Core Solo T1350.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.53 | 0.11 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 31 Watt |
Xeon X5670 has a 3109% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 103% more advanced lithography process.
Solo T1350, on the other hand, has 206% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon X5670 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo T1350 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon X5670 is a server/workstation processor while Core Solo T1350 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
