Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs X5650

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5650
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.73
Xeon E3-1285 v4
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
5.10
+36.7%

Xeon E3-1285 v4 outperforms Xeon X5650 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5650 and Xeon E3-1285 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15011226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.584.90
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Broadwell-DT (2015)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)2 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5650 and Xeon E3-1285 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm2160 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5650 and Xeon E3-1285 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5650 and Xeon E3-1285 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAMno data128 MB
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Xeon X5650 and Xeon E3-1285 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5650 and Xeon E3-1285 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5650 and Xeon E3-1285 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size288 GB32 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s29.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Iris Pro P6300
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.15 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5650 and Xeon E3-1285 v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5650 and Xeon E3-1285 v4.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5650 3.73
Xeon E3-1285 v4 5.10
+36.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5650 5710
Xeon E3-1285 v4 7808
+36.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.73 5.10
Recency 16 March 2010 2 June 2015
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

Xeon X5650 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Xeon E3-1285 v4, on the other hand, has a 36.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E3-1285 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5650 and Xeon E3-1285 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5650
Xeon X5650
Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4
Xeon E3-1285 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 451 vote

Rate Xeon X5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5650 or Xeon E3-1285 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.