Ryzen Threadripper 1940X vs Xeon X5650

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5650 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1503not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.58no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)29 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5650 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1228
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5650 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5650 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5650 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5650 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5650 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5650 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2010 29 July 2017
Physical cores 6 14
Threads 12 28
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon X5650 has 89.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X5650 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X5650 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1940X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5650 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5650
Xeon X5650
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940X
Ryzen Threadripper 1940X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 452 votes

Rate Xeon X5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5650 or Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.