Celeron N3350E vs Xeon X5647

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5647 and Celeron N3350E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1675not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.78no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency2.04no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)no data
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$175no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5647 and Celeron N3350E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads82
Base clock speed2.93 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature80 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5647 and Celeron N3350E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366no data
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5647 and Celeron N3350E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Smart Idleno data-

Security technologies

Xeon X5647 and Celeron N3350E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5647 and Celeron N3350E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5647 and Celeron N3350E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size288 GB8 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5647 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon X5647 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5647 and Celeron N3350E.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 February 2011 1 July 2019
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon X5647 has 300% more threads.

Celeron N3350E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 2066.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X5647 and Celeron N3350E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X5647 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N3350E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5647 and Celeron N3350E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5647
Xeon X5647
Intel Celeron N3350E
Celeron N3350E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 17 votes

Rate Xeon X5647 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron N3350E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5647 or Celeron N3350E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.