EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon X5570
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4585PX outperforms Xeon X5570 by a whopping 1974% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2204 | 99 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.98 | 66.99 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.84 | 9.73 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Gainestown (2009−2010) | Grado (2025) |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 (17 years ago) | 13 May 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | $699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 4585PX has 2148% better value for money than Xeon X5570.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Xeon X5570 and EPYC 4585PX: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5570 and EPYC 4585PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5570 and EPYC 4585PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon X5570 and EPYC 4585PX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5570 and EPYC 4585PX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5570 and EPYC 4585PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 144 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5570 and EPYC 4585PX.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.89 | 39.20 |
| Recency | 30 March 2009 | 13 May 2025 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 170 Watt |
Xeon X5570 has 79% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4585PX, on the other hand, has a 1974% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 4585PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon X5570 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
