Opteron 3260 HE vs Xeon X5550

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5550
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.91
+32.6%
Opteron 3260 HE
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.44

Xeon X5550 outperforms Opteron 3260 HE by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5550 and Opteron 3260 HE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19762192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.320.61
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.903.03
Architecture codenameGainestown (2009−2010)Zurich (2012)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)20 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$62$125

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Opteron 3260 HE has 91% better value for money than Xeon X5550.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5550 and Opteron 3260 HE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size263 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5550 and Opteron 3260 HE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,PLGA1366AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5550 and Opteron 3260 HE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5550 and Opteron 3260 HE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5550 and Opteron 3260 HE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5550 and Opteron 3260 HE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size144 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5550 and Opteron 3260 HE.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5550 1.91
+32.6%
Opteron 3260 HE 1.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5550 3027
+32.6%
Opteron 3260 HE 2283

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 1.44
Recency 30 March 2009 20 March 2012
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon X5550 has a 32.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Opteron 3260 HE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 111.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5550 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 3260 HE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5550 and Opteron 3260 HE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5550
Xeon X5550
AMD Opteron 3260 HE
Opteron 3260 HE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 41 vote

Rate Xeon X5550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Opteron 3260 HE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5550 or Opteron 3260 HE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.