FX-4130 vs Xeon X5492
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X5492 outperforms FX-4130 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2319 | 2358 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.32 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.47 | 0.53 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | no data | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 1 July 2008 (17 years ago) | 27 August 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $112 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Xeon X5492 and FX-4130: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.9 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 63 °C | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 V |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5492 and FX-4130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA771 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5492 and FX-4130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5492 and FX-4130 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5492 and FX-4130 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5492 and FX-4130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5492 and FX-4130.
| PCIe version | no data | n/a |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.66 | 1.56 |
| Recency | 1 July 2008 | 27 August 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 125 Watt |
Xeon X5492 has a 6% higher aggregate performance score.
FX-4130, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 41% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon X5492 and AMD FX-4130.
Be aware that Xeon X5492 is a server/workstation processor while FX-4130 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
