Apple M1 vs Xeon X5470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5470
2008, $1,386
4 cores / 4 threads, 120 Watt
1.64

M1 outperforms Xeon X5470 by a whopping 186% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23251472
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency0.58no data
DesignerIntelApple
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameHarpertown (2007−2008)no data
Release date8 September 2008 (17 years ago)10 November 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,386no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5470 and M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.33 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed0.33 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache6 MB (per die)16 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache16 MB
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)63 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5470 and M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketLGA771no data
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5470 and M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5470 and M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5470 and M1 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5470 and M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M1 8-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5470 and M1.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon X5470 1.64
Apple M1 4.69
+186%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon X5470 2871
Samples: 176
Apple M1 8207
+186%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.64 4.69
Recency 8 September 2008 10 November 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has a 186% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon X5470 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5470 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 123 votes

Rate Xeon X5470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2438 votes

Rate M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon X5470 and M1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.