Xeon W-3375 vs X5460

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5460
2007
120 Watt
1.62
Xeon W-3375
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
37.20
+2196%

Xeon W-3375 outperforms Xeon X5460 by a whopping 2196% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5460 and Xeon W-3375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking209985
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.2813.05
Architecture codenameno dataIce Lake-W (2021)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5460 and Xeon W-3375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data38
Threadsno data76
Base clock speed3.16 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature63 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5460 and Xeon W-3375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5460 and Xeon W-3375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon X5460 and Xeon W-3375 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5460 and Xeon W-3375 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5460 and Xeon W-3375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5460 and Xeon W-3375.

PCIe versionno data4
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5460 1.62
Xeon W-3375 37.20
+2196%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5460 2575
Xeon W-3375 59091
+2195%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5460 417
Xeon W-3375 1818
+336%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5460 1186
Xeon W-3375 17713
+1394%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.62 37.20
Recency 1 October 2007 29 July 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon X5460 has 125% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3375, on the other hand, has a 2196.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5460 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5460 and Xeon W-3375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5460
Xeon X5460
Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 327 votes

Rate Xeon X5460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5460 or Xeon W-3375, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.