Celeron J3355E vs Xeon X5460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2309not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.52no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameHarpertown (2007−2008)no data
Release date11 November 2007 (17 years ago)1 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,172no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5460 and Celeron J3355E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.16 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.17 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache6 MB (per die)no data
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)63 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5460 and Celeron J3355E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketLGA771no data
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5460 and Celeron J3355E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5460 and Celeron J3355E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5460 and Celeron J3355E are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5460 and Celeron J3355E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5460 and Celeron J3355E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon X5460 and Celeron J3355E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5460 and Celeron J3355E.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2007 1 July 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon X5460 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron J3355E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon X5460 and Intel Celeron J3355E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X5460 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J3355E is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5460
Xeon X5460
Intel Celeron J3355E
Celeron J3355E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 349 votes

Rate Xeon X5460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron J3355E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon X5460 and Celeron J3355E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.