A10-5800B vs Xeon X5460
Aggregate performance score
A10-5800B outperforms Xeon X5460 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5460 and A10-5800B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1972 | 1851 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.33 | 2.55 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | no data | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 1 October 2007 (16 years ago) | 2 October 2012 (11 years ago) |
| Current price | $42 | $68 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
A10-5800B has 673% better value for money than Xeon X5460.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5460 and A10-5800B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.16 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 63 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5460 and A10-5800B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA771 | FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5460 and A10-5800B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5460 and A10-5800B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5460 and A10-5800B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5460 and A10-5800B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 7660D |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A10-5800B outperforms Xeon X5460 by 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
A10-5800B outperforms Xeon X5460 by 18% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
A10-5800B outperforms Xeon X5460 by 1% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon X5460 outperforms A10-5800B by 12% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.66 | 1.96 |
| Recency | 1 October 2007 | 2 October 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 100 Watt |
The A10-5800B is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5460 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon X5460 is a server/workstation processor while A10-5800B is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5460 and A10-5800B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
