Xeon E5462 vs X5450
Aggregated performance score
X5450 outperforms E5462 by 12% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Xeon X5450 and Xeon E5462 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1996 | 2098 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.32 | 0.27 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Release date | 1 October 2007 (16 years old) | 1 October 2007 (16 years old) |
Current price | $138 | $125 |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon X5450 has 19% better value for money than Xeon E5462.
Technical specs
Xeon X5450 and Xeon E5462 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
L3 cache | 12 MB L2 Cache | 12 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 63 °C | 67 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.35V | 0.85V-1.35V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5450 and Xeon E5462 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | LGA771 | LGA771 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5450 and Xeon E5462. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
Demand Based Switching | + | + |
FSB parity | + | + |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon X5450 and Xeon E5462 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | - |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5450 and Xeon E5462 are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | - | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
X5450 outperforms E5462 by 12% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
X5450 outperforms E5462 by 11% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
E5462 outperforms X5450 by 3% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
E5462 outperforms X5450 by 11% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.55 | 1.39 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 80 Watt |
The Xeon X5450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5462 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5450 and Xeon E5462, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.