Pentium J3710 vs Xeon X5450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5450
2007
120 Watt
1.54
+63.8%

Xeon X5450 outperforms Pentium J3710 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5450 and Pentium J3710 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20352412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.320.33
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Architecture codenameno dataAirmont (2015−2016)
Release date1 October 2007 (16 years ago)10 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$161
Current price$73 $40 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium J3710 has 3% better value for money than Xeon X5450.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5450 and Pentium J3710 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.64 GHz
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature63 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5450 and Pentium J3710 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5450 and Pentium J3710. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
FSB parity+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon X5450 and Pentium J3710 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5450 and Pentium J3710 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5450 and Pentium J3710. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data740 MHz
Execution Unitsno data18

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5450 and Pentium J3710 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon X5450 and Pentium J3710 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5450 and Pentium J3710.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data5
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5450 1.54
+63.8%
Pentium J3710 0.94

Xeon X5450 outperforms Pentium J3710 by 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X5450 2389
+63.6%
Pentium J3710 1460

Xeon X5450 outperforms Pentium J3710 by 64% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon X5450 382
+92.9%
Pentium J3710 198

Xeon X5450 outperforms Pentium J3710 by 93% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon X5450 1096
+90.9%
Pentium J3710 574

Xeon X5450 outperforms Pentium J3710 by 91% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.54 0.94
Recency 1 October 2007 10 January 2016
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 6 Watt

The Xeon X5450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium J3710 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5450 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium J3710 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5450 and Pentium J3710, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5450
Xeon X5450
Intel Pentium J3710
Pentium J3710

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 298 votes

Rate Xeon X5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 203 votes

Rate Pentium J3710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5450 or Pentium J3710, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.