Itanium 9350 vs Xeon X5450
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5450 and Itanium 9350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2148 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | 1.19 | no data |
Release date | 1 October 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5450 and Itanium 9350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | no data | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | no data | 8 |
Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1.87 GHz |
L3 cache | 12 MB L2 Cache | 24 MB L3 Cache |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 63 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5450 and Itanium 9350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | LGA771 | FCLGA1248 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 185 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5450 and Itanium 9350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | 1.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
Demand Based Switching | + | + |
PAE | no data | 50 Bit |
FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5450 and Itanium 9350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5450 and Itanium 9350 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 October 2007 | 1 January 2010 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 185 Watt |
Xeon X5450 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 54.2% lower power consumption.
Itanium 9350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X5450 and Itanium 9350. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5450 and Itanium 9350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.